When our spiritual teacher, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, explained the philosophy of Bhakti Yoga to all of us students in the 1960s-70s there was already a small ecology movement in this country. We were part of that movement, and when we encountered his teachings, we were pleasantly surprised that, in addition to everything else it offered, the philosophy he taught was “Green” (though it wasn’t called that back then). The mission statement he wrote for his organization of followers included, among other points, an aim to “bring the members closer together for the purpose of teaching a simpler, more natural way of life.”

Srila Prabhupada’s motto of “Simple Living, High Thinking” was very attractive to us because we believed Western culture had lost it’s way, and was overwhelmed by greed and materialism. It seemed futile to think that accumulating “things” would make us happy. Prabhupada’s motto rang true.

He told us that everything is the energy of the Supreme (Krishna), that everything is interconnected. And since it is, to waste Krishna’s energy is short-sighted and unacceptable. He related stories of how his father would pick up a rice grain from between the cracks in the floor, rather than waste it—telling our guru (his son) that it was not good to waste what Krishna had given them. He also talked about how his father would set out little bowls of rice at night in his cloth shop for the mice so they would not eat the cloth. Rather than trap and kill the mice, he supplied their meager needs so that they would not bother his goods.

Prabhupada taught us that we would each receive our “quota” from Krishna and material nature, and that we should be satisfied with what Krishna supplied, and not to envy or try to assume anyone else’s quota. He said we should not focus on accumulating wealth or possessions, but accept what came to us in the course of our service and use it to serve Krishna and his devotees. He told us “Utility is the Principle” we should follow. We need not renounce something (like technology) which can be effectively used in the service of Krishna and his devotees. The trick is in having the individual and collective honesty to determine when the technology (or whatever) is being utilized for Supreme service, rather than solely for personal sense gratification. He also said that “Purity is the force”—that along with living simply, we should endeavor to live purely. When you live purely, and consciously, the earth does not suffer.

Prabhupada established farm ashrams because he believed that the general populace should be shown how living simply and in harmony with nature, combined with serving the Supreme, could be a satisfying way of life. We lived at one of Prabhupada’s farm ashrams for several years. The farm was practically self-sufficient. We cared for cows who supplied abundant milk, and we used their manure for fertilizer. We trained oxen to plow the fields to grow the vegetables we ate each day. We heated the buildings with dead trees we cut up from the farm property, and we worked together to build by hand whatever needed to be built. And while it was an austere life, it was also satisfying. In addition to the training in Bhakti philosophy, the farm taught us practical lessons, and trained us that happiness did not come from “things,” but from within.

Those years at the farm ashram changed the course of our lives. Since then, many of Srila Prabhupada’s disciples have started communities around the world that aim at self-sufficiency, and explore self-contained techniques such as natural pest and weed controls, the production of alternative fuel, waste management, and crop rotation. In keeping with the Krishna conscious ideal of “simple living and high thinking,” they’ve made it their goal to produce only what they need and to avoid selfish excesses, thus providing a model for a conscientious spiritually-centered society.

One of the green aspects of our spiritual master’s teachings was a commitment to vegetarianism. In his constitution for his students, one of the points he wanted to accomplish by his teaching was “To popularize the vegetable-grain diet under approved methods in order that full value of protein, carbohydrate, fat and vitamin benefit may be derived therefrom.”

Below are listed just a few statistics which will help explain why a vegetarian diet is the diet required for those who care about the environment and the impact of their actions on it:

• 50% of all the earth’s water consumption is used for livestock production. It requires 100 times the amount of water to produce 1 lb. of meat—than it does to produce 1 lb. of wheat.

• It takes less water to feed a vegetarian for a YEAR, than it does to feed a meat-eater for a MONTH.

• One acre of pasture produces about 165 lbs. of beef, but the same acre can produce 20,000 lbs. of potatoes, for example.

• It takes 16 lbs. of grain to produce a lb. of beef. The American livestock population consumes enough grain & soybeans each year to feed more than 5 times the entire American population.

• 50 times more fossil fuels are needed to produce a meat-centered diet than for a vegetarian diet.

• Feeding grains to animals is a circuitous, wasteful, & inefficient way of producing food for people. For example, in the U.S., livestock eat 145 million tons of grain and soy per year, but produce only 21 million tons of animal products. No car owner would appreciate buying 145 gallons of gas, but only being allowed to use 21 gallons. [dated stats, the situation, presently, is even worse]

• Agriculture is the leading cause of water pollution in the U.S.—with most due to livestock manure.

• From 1960 to 1985, alone, 40% of all Central American rain forests were destroyed to create pasture for beef cattle.

• A typical 4 oz. Hamburger (harmburger) made from rain-forest beef represents the destruction of 55 sq. feet of tropical forest (an area = to the size of a small kitchen).

• An acre of trees is spared, each year, by each individual who switches to a meatless diet.

The philosophy of Bhakti Yoga is so ancient it precedes the environmental impact we’ve seen meat based diets have. It was not the primary reason Bhakti Yogis are vegetarian. A Bhakti Yogi is a vegetarian because it is requested by the Supreme, Krishna. Krishna considers all living beings to be significant, each a spirit soul worthy of His love. He has asked that we treat the animals in this world as brothers and sisters, and allow them to live out their natural life without fear of slaughter. It is noteworthy, however, that the diet promoted by Krishna also happens to be the most beneficial for the planet, and for our bodies. A coincidence? We don’t think so.

When one examines spiritual philosophies to be considered as guidance for one’s life, one ought to investigate where that philosophy stands on, and if it addresses, issues that are important to us. Back in the early 1970s, when we were introduced to Bhakti Yoga, we were happy to see that, in addition to satisfying our spiritual needs, Bhakti Yoga promoted directly within the philosophy, a gentle footprint on the planet.

]]> http://www.bhaktivedantacenter.com/2009/12/558/feed/ 1 http://www.bhaktivedantacenter.com/2009/11/pushpull/ http://www.bhaktivedantacenter.com/2009/11/pushpull/#comments Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:07:27 +0000 Editor http://www.bhaktivedantacenter.com/?p=491 “How much is push and how much is pull?  By push, I mean the conscious way we push ourselves towards spiritual development through our intellectual understanding of its necessity.  By pull, I mean the natural attraction that draws us towards development. Both, I suppose are interwoven, but often I feel there to be a tension between the two.  Is there a proper balance?”

RESPONSE:

Yes, they are interwoven, and yes there is a natural balance that adjusts itself as we progress.

In the beginning, the attraction is often more to a paradigm that answers many questions that no one has answered successfully for us in the past. That propels us initially to have the faith to investigate, and so we undertake to learn the elements involved in the practices of Bhakti (karma, modes of nature, making the yogic link, etc.). This is our “push.”  This is the beginning of Sadhana-Bhakti (practices that are favorable to the “flowering” of Bhakti in our hearts).

This is an important and necessary stage, akin to learning the scales when you begin to study piano. At first we must push ourselves a bit to practice the piano, because, frankly, we can’t produce beautiful music with our hands yet. So, in the beginning  ”push” is prominent, but there is a hint of what is to come, and we hear others who can play, and we want what they have, we sense it is life-changing and beautiful, and with that, there is a “pull.” But at this stage in our Bhakti practice, we may not directly be all that “emotionally involved” yet. But if it all resonates with us, we may look back occasionally, but we continue following this intriguing path to see where it might lead.

As we progress further down the path, new landscapes appear, and it gets lovelier and lovelier, and we begin to feel pulled, we want to progress faster. We want more—our hearts feel pulled by Krishna from within. Our hands now know exactly where to go on the spiritual keyboard to create music. It may not yet be a full blown symphony of the heart, but it is original and pure and pleasurable.

In time there is no need to “push,” it is most, or all “pull.” Along the way, we don’t consult the steps, we may not analyze where we are, unless perhaps we happen on them in our reading on occassion. We just invite this beautiful Bhakti path into our lives and trust if we continue, we will reach the goal.

This reminds me of my Aikido training. Aikido is a complex martial art. Very complex. When I began my training I was pulled by my sensei’s mastery. It was frankly a thing of beauty to watch. I wanted to be able to do what he did.  Initially, I felt I was slow to learn, others in my class had taken other martial arts and they seemed ahead of me in all facets. My sensei said, “Don’t pay attention to that, compete only with yourself.” I trusted his words and did just that. I did a lot of “pushing” to keep getting on the mat and training, in the first few years. When I finally received my black belt, I remember looking back and thinking how all along, I didn’t think I was progressing all that much.

Srila Prabhupada promised us that if we just did as he instructed, we would be captured by Krishna, and He would be captured by us. Gradually, those of us who took his teachings to heart, were changed by them, and the push and pull balanced, and tipped in the direction of the pull.

I remember that Prabhupada used a nice example on this point, as he likened us to iron filings, and Krsna to the consummate magnet. When we choose material life we’re (consciously or unconsciously) covered-over (akin to heavily encrusted, or dirty, particles of iron). Taking up yogic/spiritual life is the process whereby we clean away the layers of “dirt” covering the filings. Then we’re in a position to be more readily attracted to Krishna and spiritual life. The state of attraction is always there, it’s really a case of how one wishes to respond. Of course, the closer we move toward Krsna, the stronger the attraction, and the more that’s revealed.

As we decide more and more that we want to get more serious on this path, there are innumerable things we can do to speed the process. There is much to read, we make sure to offer our food, we increase our chanting, we pull Krishna into our lives much like we would bring a new friend in. We begin to feel more comfortable in the association of other Bhaktas, and when we experience that taste, we start to have less of a taste for purely mundane activities. I believe AC mentioned how, as children, we naturally upon experiencing higher “tastes” in life—give up playing with dolls or playing cowboys & Indians. And just like there is no trauma to not playing with our dolls anymore, that is how we gradually change our focus. Maybe one day as an adolescent, a girlfriend might say, “Let’s play dolls!” and our thought is, ” It’s not really fun for me anymore.” But that doesn’t mean we no longer have any fun. It just means what is fun to us has changed.

The 1st phase (sraddha) is dependent upon our desire to take up spiritual life, while later it becomes a combination of deepening that desire because we are experiencing what’s revealed. As Amit Acara mentioned last Sunday in class, as we engage in devotional service (Sadhana Bhakti-yoga) we receive assistance all along the way. Initiated Bhakti-yogis receive an enormous leg up, so to speak, from their respective teachers/gurus—both Initiating (those who accept our karma and situate us so we can, properly and ultimately, relate with Krsna),  and from our Instructing gurus (those who give proper and relevant instructions). And of course, Paramatma (localized aspect of Krsna within every living entity’s body) helps, as nicely explained in Bg.—from within—as He sanctions what our actual desires are. Hence the admonition in yoga to control the mind, for as we desire—so goes our consciousness, and therefore our “life.”

An intellectual understanding of the need for spiritual life is necessary, but it is only a preliminary one, particularly because we’re making this assessment with our material mind and intellect—which, by their very nature of being material, can’t in- and of-themselves make the leap to the transcendental platform. That is, engaging material phenomena—can give us material results only. However, when the mind becomes more and more cleansed and understanding deepens by following the discipline of Sadhana-Bhakti, then we’re afforded greater insight, and the attraction to Krishna is spontaneous and deeply heartfelt. Depending upon the depth and density of material conditioning, everyone responds, initially, and necessarily, at a different pace.

Of course there must be a balance if one’s to be successful, and thus you’ve probably heard us state that real, or actual, spiritual/yogic life is a GRADUAL process. It’s a little like choosing sides between something which is known and comfortable (and we know what material life can provide), and something hazy in the beginning—but which supplies us what we’ve been looking for, for lifetimes (i.e. yogic/spiritual life). The two can’t even be compared, and yet, because of material consciousness—in the beginning it is a little hard to have confidence in the transition.